Scientists calculate true carbon footprint of premium dog foods

LONDON — Dogs fed on premium, meat-rich pet food can have a bigger dietary carbon footprint than their owners, a new study has found.

Scientists from the Universities of Edinburgh and Exeter calculated the carbon footprint of almost 1,000 commercially available dog foods, based on emissions generated during the production of ingredients.

Their sample included a selection of dry, wet and raw foods, including plant-based and grain-free options.

The researchers found “striking” differences in the environmental impact of different foods, with those with the highest impact generating up to 65 times more emissions than the lowest.

Wet, raw and meat-rich products were found to generate substantially more emissions than dry dog food.

Meanwhile, dry foods marketed as “grain-free” tended to have a higher carbon footprint than non-grain-free options.

The researchers said using large amounts of prime meat – which could otherwise be eaten by humans – pushes up emissions, while the use of nutritious, low-demand cuts can have a lower climate impact.

They also said plant-based dog foods are likely to reduce emissions, but cautioned that only a small number of such foods were available in the study.

Overall the researchers estimated that the production of ingredients used in UK dog food contributes about 1% of the country’s total greenhouse gas emissions.

They added that if all the dogs in the world were were given the same food as dogs in the UK, this could generate greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to over half of those from burning jet fuel in commercial flights each year.

The study’s principal investigator, John Harvey, from the University of Edinburgh, said: “As a veterinary surgeon working on environmental...