Теория Рекламы :: RE: Общая Теория Рекламы: Реклама Агрессии (комментарии) 8
Добавлено: 08.10.2018 15:54 (GMT 3)
| Цитата: |
|
'Repulsive to children and adults': how explicit should public art get?
[img]https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/292fd731e13c3594fe8896a1e2b36561c83ab3ed/0_60_1800_1080/master/1800.jpg?width=1920&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=1fb2634eeda4a544ad6e712e05133df3[/img] ... Advertising regulators in Germany, the UK and US all refused to display the figures – male and female – uncensored. A source close to the decision-making of Transport for London expressed concern that the depiction of genitals, though artistic, could be at odds with public wellbeing. The decisions demonstrated not only Schiele’s continued capacity to shock, 108 years after his nudes were removed from an exhibition for their “obscene nature”, but also the unseen ceiling on artistic expression in shared spaces. Public art is usually spoken of approvingly, as is art that pushes boundaries. But is there a limit to how challenged we’re prepared to be in places like airports and train stations, where everyone has to go? ... |
Реклама Агрессии.
__________________________________________________________
С уважением и отраслевыми пожеланиями, Dimitriy.