Though the two aircraft are unlikely to ever face each other in genuine air-to-air combat, it would not be impossible, given their export to the Middle East.

The Rafale and F-35 represent different aircraft design philosophies. The French Rafale is a highly refined fourth-generation-plus multirole fighter, while the American F-35 is a fifth-generation stealth fighter built around sensor fusion. The two jets were built at different times to do different things, and are relatively unlikely to ever encounter one another in combat. Still, for the sake of evaluating the factions of Western aircraft, it is worth asking how the two would compare head-to-head.

Dassault Rafale vs. F-35A Lightning II: A Head-to-Head Comparison

Aircraft	Dassault Rafale	F-35 Lightning II
Year Introduced	2001 (French Navy IOC)	2015 (USAF IOC – F-35A)
Number Built	~270+	~1,000+
Length	50.1 ft (15.3 m)	51.4 ft (15.7 m)
Wingspan	35.9 ft (10.9 m)	35 ft (10.7 m)
Weight (MTOW)	~54,000 lb (24,500 kg)	~70,000 lb (31,800 kg)
Engines	Two Safran M88 turbofans	One Pratt & Whitney F135 turbofan
Top Speed	Mach 1.8 (~1,380 mph / ~2,220 km/h)	Mach 1.6 (~1,200 mph / ~1,930 km/h)
Range (Ferry)	~2,300 mi (3,700 km)	~1,500 mi (2,400 km)
Service Ceiling	~50,000 ft (15,240 m)	~50,000 ft (15,240 m)
Loadout	~20,900 lb (9,500 kg) on 14 hardpoints	~18,000 lb (8,160 kg) internal + external
Aircrew	1 (C/M), 2 (B)	1

How Are the Rafale and the F-35 Different?

The Rafale is a twin-engine jet featuring a canard-delta design. In line with French doctrine, the Rafale concept prioritizes agility, multirole flexibility, and low maintenance requirements, leading to high sortie rates. The jet was built to facilitate independent French power projection—essentially a way to reduce dependence on the United States.

Perhaps understandably, the F-35—manufactured by US aerospace giant Lockheed Martin, with additional participation from hundreds of other defense contractors—is built with different priorities in mind. The F-35 has been exported to US allies around the world (though never to France); it is a single-engine stealth platform built for low observability, networked warfare, and sensor fusion dominance.  The jet was intended to operate as part of a broader joint force, the common denominator amongst many Western-aligned air forces. 

From a technical perspective, the two jets are quite different. The Rafale enjoys high maneuverability and a strong thrust-to-weight ratio. The SPECTRA system offers excellent electronic warfare capabilities, while the external pylons are compatible with a wide range, and high payload, of air-to-air and strike weapons. The F-35’s cutting-edge stealth shaping reduces radar cross-section (RCS). It is outfitted with an advanced AESA radar and distributed aperture system and is capable of fusing sensor data into a single tactical picture. Internal weapons carriage preserves stealth—giving it an edge over the French jet—but reduces payload. Lastly, the jet was designed with advanced electronic capabilities, to share targeting data across networks. 

So Which Plane Would Win in a Fight?

In beyond-visual-range engagement, the F-35 has an advantage in detection capability, as its lower radar signature gives it a smaller profile. The Rafale, meanwhile, relies on advanced radar and electronic warfare to complicate enemy targeting.

Overall, in a BVR fight, the F-35 likely has an edge due to survivability and information advantage. The scales are evened in a within-visual-range engagement. At close range, the Rafale’s canard configuration enhances nose authority; the F-35 is less optimized for dogfighting, but still capable, as helmet-mounted cueing and high off-foresight missiles level the playing field. So, WVR outcome depends heavily on pilot skill and missile employment, though the Rafale is the more traditionally equipped pure dogfighter. 

In terms of employment, the Rafale is effective in expeditionary operations and mixed air-to-air and strike roles. The French jet is best used with strong EW and support assets. The F-35 functions best as a sensor node and targeting platform, a first-day-of-war penetrator that is often paired with legacy fighters, which act as complementary missile trucks. 

Strategically, the Rafale offers sovereign capability and high-end multirole performance without full stealth cost. The F-35 offers integrated alliance warfare and information domain. Neither is universally superior, necessarily—context defines the advantage.

Could the Rafale and the F-35 Ever Fight for Real?

Would the two jets ever meet? They do regularly—in joint training exercises between NATO and allied forces.

Direct combat between a Rafale pilot and an F-35 pilot in a hostile context is somewhat unlikely. But it is not totally impossible, either. The Rafale has been exported to the Gulf region, where its customers include Egypt, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. The F-35, by contrast, has found a willing customer in Israel, which currently operates nearly 50 F-35I “Adir” fighters.

That Israel is on one side of this ledger, and Qatar on the other, is notable. Indeed, Israeli F-35s are believed to have participated in an airstrike against a Hamas facility in Qatar in September 2025, reportedly killing six people. Had Qatar had a chance to react, its Rafale might have scrambled to fight the Israeli planes—leading to an instance of genuine air-to-air combat between the two aircraft.

About the Author: Harrison Kass

Harrison Kass is a senior defense and national security writer at The National Interest. Kass is an attorney and former political candidate who joined the US Air Force as a pilot trainee before being medically discharged. He focuses on military strategy, aerospace, and global security affairs. He holds a JD from the University of Oregon and a master’s in Global Journalism and International Relations from NYU.

The post Could the Dassault Rafale Beat the F-35 in Air-to-Air Combat? appeared first on The National Interest.